PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

By: Arif Budiman

Major problem in the current science building is now the role of the human sciences as a means of reaching the goal is not going well. There is a big problem at the level that deals with the means in building knowledge structures that unravel the origins of science. Deals with the means we have not been able to answer satisfactorily about how transendentalitas be described. Also deals with the means we have not been able to accommodate objects as targets studied transcendental science. Example, there are those who view religion as a science, at the same time people do not accept that religion as a science, for example transendentalitas God. Then what happens, never deals with the means to side with the fair aspect of the deity. In fact, transendentalitas is a very fundamental element in our keberkeyakinan. Inability transendentalitas deals with the means to answer this problem should be immediately recognized as a problem of civilization. The next problem is getting the answer to all the basic dimensions of human beings on God to arguments and scientific basis. For religious or godless are behaviors that have clear mechanisms in science. Mechanism in question is a scientific method. Have transendentalitas can be studied scientifically, but relies on the west for this method is not very satisfactory.The current structure of science is made up of human thought as if in answer to the problem of civilization. The first question to be asked related to the science is "Has the science of helping people to pursue the stages of history toward its final destination. We often find is a rich man with a dry science but of value as a human being first himself before God, the Creator (by those who stand on the paradigm of religion). Science is a tool for humans. He became a guide in every step. Humans can not be separated from the sciences. There are three main points in the theory of knowledge, the first ontology to mean what it is science, the second deals with the means which means how the knowledge was obtained and the third is the show for what axiology (or usefulness of science). A discussion of science is usually focused on the discussion deals with the means to discuss the science of human knowledge. From which knowledge is obtained, how the process, the method how are things in deals with the means to reach. The point deals with the means can be understood as a way to gain knowledge.Discussion of important deals with the means to be very important even when the dominance of Western paradigms of thinking about science or so real science building perched above. Even a high measure of civilization is often determined on the basis of the philosophy of science is built. Deals with the means attempt to reinforce the notion of transcendence in the region deals with the means of religion. Because it had been born a denial of science against religion, and it was also the cause of religion are not able to touch or are reluctant to philosophize. Deals with the means it actually does not need to appear or be raised in case the idea of ​​this science (deals with the means) are able to address the current problems of science. The fact that there is otherwise deals with the means that there is no God transendetalitas mempu accommodate the idea. Western science that we see today and pierced through in the middle of civilization, has left many wondering who would not go unanswered while the increasingly complex humanitarian problems. There is missing from the human side. There is a value that is removed, but the value is so closely in humans. Radicalism in the paradigm or perspective of western science has delivered many secular ideas that proved dry and to distance people from nature that tauhidi (religious value). When science is seen in this perspective (west), which is born of ideas based on human authority (anthroposentris). Experience the dark age in Europe formed the basis for rejecting the theological concepts (religion). mucullah further ideas based on the knowledge structure and ability to think of human rationality.If science is named experience, the experience left a valuable message to determine the next appropriate step forward. It could be the experience that is all the more bitter experience painful. Furthermore on the basis of that experience, of course he did not want to feel again the bitter things that ever happened. On this point we certainly know that the ultimate goal of every human step is to he found good. This bitterness never expected. Through experience that a man take heed. While contained within the category of not only the experience because the experience is just a small part of the "Grand Narrative" of science. Intellectuals who believed the human narrative can give directions and solutions to every problem that comes.So not negotiable, science is a necessity in the conduct of human life. The problem is, what kind of science that can be used to achieve the purpose of man? The expected course of true science, human science capable of delivering on the goals and needs. But in reality, man found himself in a drought, a condition that he not obtain in western science. The options are based on the fact that there is demand to use that knowledge (read: western). Evidence of the usefulness of science that he used was not dead. Many benefits are already being felt. Science that benefits the science that's used. Instead science is not useful it will be discarded or abandoned.Science is the right knowledge. So if knowledge is false, then obviously it can not be called a science. Science is understood as an experience, the experience could be called a science with science through a number of procedures or the scientific method. Whether or not our experience, certainly not without basis in advance to properly assess or not a science. We also reserve the right to say our experience was a true experience. Under these conditions, then we actually have been able to give the judge the nature or something is right or wrong and to knowledge of a grounding.Conceptual basis of science (deals with the means) is expected to meet human needs for true knowledge gained. Human entities should be the main basis for choosing science as a tool to be used. Examples of simple questions "whether I'll use Western science or no" answer, of course as long as western science is good and humans are able to deliver on the settlement of the problems encountered, then the western science is an option to use. In fact, not all human science is capable of delivering on what is expected of men. If we have a goal close to God, then we need a tool to achieve that goal. Tool to achieve this is called a science. Often we find man using science he believed capable of reaching the goal, but the opposite. On the other hand we also see there the magicians, but the dry side of humanity (soul), He was not able to be close to God. So it can be concluded that the science is that science can not serve as a helpful tool for humans. In the extreme, it can not be called a science because the basic assessment of something called science or knowledge if something is proven true.Paradigms are very different between western science with religion, a (read: Islam), we can see in many aspects, one on the methodology of science. First on the ontology, the science of western emphasis on science attraction phenomenon (something visible), while the Islamic emphasis on the phenomenon and Noumena (not visible). This fact can we look at the idea of ​​a materialistic science. These ideas are centered on the ability of human reason as a central idea.Example of "the idea of ​​God", for them is something that can not be empirically alias could not be proved, there is no physical reason. Furthermore the idea of ​​God (read religion) is not directly placed as an unscientific idea. Here seharusnnya woke up in our consciousness that deals with the means used for this man was leading to "no religion". Thinking about the subtle invitation is framed within the idea of ​​secularism. Rationalism and materialism busy lately discussed and used as the basis of thinking. Islam is a clue. Islam places great emphasis in the position of Science. One is the belief that the Koran is the source of all sources of knowledge. Objects that exist in the Quran deals with the means in view of the west, may not be scientific. An example of the angels. Paradigm of western science will certainly be questioned Scientifics angels. Because the view of western science must be proved. Could prove the existence of angels. Muslims believe the angel that believes in things unseen. The question "whether something can not be scientifically proven to be rejected?. The answer is no. We can still believe in the existence of the supernatural (angels). Sense we may not accept its existence. But? Is a man not only has sense. Humans have a heart and the hearts of these men believe in the existence of angels. As mentioned earlier, the axiom that is born of debate in mind, ending with an answer without merit: "let it be about the occult religious matters". I think this is the beginning of the birth of the idea of ​​secularism, an idea that there is now an idea of ​​transendentalitas forced to be proven.Convinced of the existence of the supernatural is the scientific for Muslims. An assessment of the very paradox of the western worldview. Different perspective on things. That's what I mean as an object-oriented or west of Empirical oriented phenomenon, but in Islam is not just a phenomenon but also Noumena (metaphysical). Bagimana way to see the Noumena Regarding how to see, this is related to the second methodology, which deals with the means that I get the science. Methods used in the science of Islam is to the senses, mind and heart (QS: 3:191). While the methodology used in the western way of getting science and common sense just to use by thinking. The latter is axiology, concerns the usefulness of science. Paradigm of western science, a fragment of science dedicated to the interests of science itself. While axiology in the teachings of Islam, science was dedicated as stock da1am order to khalifatullah and devotion to God's system (QS: 51:56).Whether to believe about the existence of supernatural forces (forces beyond us), had to wait there a tool that could prove the physical results. Should we wait for the experts and technologically advanced tools that make? Do not we already have the human family is even a super powerful tool that until now scientists are not yet exist that could membuatnnya. It is a super tool. With the tools that humans are able to penetrate the higher wall thickness. He was able to read the details of creation Mighty stretch. He was able to strengthen its current stance of the universe shows its glory. Without the tools mengguanakan superior technology, the tool is always able to access and communicate with God. He was the heart. The human heart is a super tool. And expansion of human vanity has gotten rid of its role in building a civilization. Kecongkakkan mind of men that have long meminggirkannya. Liver, it is alternative. While men served many offers. The liver is a necessity when science and civilization was about to set. Deals with the means of awareness about the potential alternative is Insaniah. Not only that dipunya human mind. Humans also have a heart that is capable of measuring about everything that is before him.Deals with the means of transcendence seeks to dismantle a forgotten intellectual arrogance with religious values. Deals with the means of transcendence is the idea that the basic thrust of major human, to later become part of the science building project that can make man aware and closer to Allah SWT